Collaborative Problem Solving and Consensus Building

Cate Malek
Research Assistant, Conflict Research Consortium
University of Colorado
Based on a longer essay on Consensus Building written by Brad Spangler and Heidi Burgess for the Intractable Conflict Knowledge Base Project


Definition:

Collaborative problem solving and consensus building are processes that groups use to make plans, solve problems, develop recommendations, or make decisions in a collaborative (or cooperative) way, rather than in isolated, competitive, or confrontational way.

Users:

Collaborative processes can be used with any group of people who face a common problem. They are often used in schools, businesses, communities, organizations, and all levels of government agencies to set policy and to resolve disputes.

Description:

In a collaborative problem solving or consensus building process, representatives of all the necessary interests with a stake in an issue work together collaboratively. Participants make a good faith effort to meet the interests of all participants and to make plans, recommendations, and decisions, that if not unanimous, at least everyone can live with. These processes are usually designed by the participants themselves (often with the help of a facilitator or a mediator). This allows for considerable flexibility about who can participate, how, and what outcomes will be considered. However, these processes tend to move through common stages.

  • They begin with an assessment of the situation. The goal is to gather information on what the issues will be, what the barriers and incentives are, which parties should be included, the time frame for the process, how people will work together, and the desired outcomes.
  • The parties then decide who will lead the process and how the meetings will be managed. They may decide they can do this themselves, or they may seek the assistance of an outside, impartial third party to manage the process.
  • They develop ground rules.
  • They decide what information they need to plan, solve problems, develop recommendations, or make decisions.
  • They exchange information, frame the issues, and discuss points of view.
  • They generate and evaluate different options, negotiate, and move toward the desired goal of the process.
  • Finally, parties check whether the plans, agreements, recommendations, or decisions will work for all authorized decision makers and whether they are implementable.
  • At this stage the plan, decision or agreement is formalized and the group develops plans to implement and monitor the outcome.

There are 10 ingredients common to all successful collaborative problem solving and consensus building processes. These are:

  1. inclusion of all affected stakeholders,
  2. definite incentives to participate,
  3. effective representation and clear accountability,
  4. opportunities for learning and capacity building,
  5. establishment of clear objectives,
  6. agreement on the scope of the process,
  7. provision of sufficient resources,
  8. full participation and communication,
  9. careful, consistent and continual process management, and
  10. clear connections between the process and how outcomes are implemented.

Example:

Collaborative problem solving processes are often used in natural resource planning. In the United States, the U.S. Forest Service has to formulate forest management plans. These plans are frequently controversial as different forest user groups: timber companies, jeepers, and snowmobilers, hikers, skiers, and environmentalists (among many others) have very different interests and concerns. Increasingly the Forest Service has brought these groups together in a collaborative process in an effort to develop a plan that is accepted – even embraced – by all these groups.

Next Steps:

People interested in pursuing a consensus process should do some reading to learn more about how these processes work. They then might approach leaders of different interest groups to try to assess their level of interest in such an endeavor. If some people are interested, it is often possible to start talking with them, and then enlist their help to bring more people into a process.

Links to Related Articles:
Public Policy and Environmental Conflicts
 
CRInfo Version VI
Copyright © 1999-2007 The Conflict Resolution Information Source
CRInfo™ is a Registered Trademark of the University of Colorado

Project Acknowledgements

The Conflict Resolution Information Source
Guy Burgess and Heidi Burgess, Co-Directors
c/o Conflict Information Consortium (Formerly Conflict Research Consortium), University of Colorado
Campus Box 580, Boulder, CO 80309
Phone: (303) 492-1635; Fax: (303) 492-2154; Contact

University of Colorado at Boulder
We must be the change we wish to see. -- Mahatma Gandhi

Featured Links
Organizations Making Noteworthy Contributions to Conflict Resolution and Peace:
Peace Keeping and Stability Operations Institute
Peace Keeping and Stability Operations Institute (PKSOI)


Partner Projects
CRInfo mini-grant recipients, gateway partners, and affiliated projects:
Collaborative for Conflict Mgmt. in Mental Health
Collaborative for Conflict Mgmt. in Mental Health

"[P]romoting the use of conflict management techniques in the mental health and social service systems through training, technical assistance, consultation, information dissemination and evaluation services"

International Campaign to Ban Landmines (ICBL)
International Campaign to Ban Landmines (ICBL)

1997 Nobel Peace Laureate